Stat |
Rank |
Date |
Comment |
|
1/117 |
02-20-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/182 |
04-01-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/116 |
02-02-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
1:44:30 |
1/108 |
10-17-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/128 |
08-28-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/115 |
02-24-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-07-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/178 |
12-16-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/111 |
10-31-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/131 |
09-10-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-12-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/104 |
09-06-06 |
1:25 check, 1:46 is definitely possible. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
01-22-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/112 |
01-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/124 |
05-13-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
1:47:82 |
1/105 |
09-22-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-12-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/114 |
01-13-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/107 |
10-14-06 |
Changed because I died twice on my 1:44, whereas this was one straight run. checkpoint abuse= suck |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/149 |
10-28-08 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/135 |
11-27-07 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/175 |
09-26-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
06-02-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/169 |
07-25-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/138 |
01-01-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/164 |
05-22-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
06-23-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/124 |
06-17-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/173 |
08-11-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/137 |
02-24-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/167 |
06-12-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/144 |
07-13-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/127 |
08-12-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/174 |
08-24-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/139 |
03-12-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/167 |
07-06-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/134 |
10-30-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/175 |
09-18-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/141 |
05-04-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/169 |
07-13-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/182 |
04-06-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/116 |
02-02-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/175 |
10-19-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/108 |
10-18-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/129 |
08-31-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/115 |
02-24-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-07-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/178 |
12-16-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/111 |
11-10-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/131 |
09-10-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-24-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/105 |
09-07-06 |
1:25 check, 1:46 is definitely possible. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
01-27-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/112 |
01-07-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/124 |
05-16-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/105 |
09-26-06 |
bah, this was a 1:44 but for some unknown reason I missed the goal. 1:23.2 last check. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-12-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/115 |
01-13-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/107 |
10-14-06 |
Changed because I died twice on my 1:44, whereas this was one straight run. checkpoint abuse= suck |
|
1/170 |
07-14-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/135 |
12-03-07 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/176 |
10-04-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
06-03-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/168 |
07-28-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/136 |
01-04-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/164 |
05-25-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/144 |
06-24-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/125 |
06-19-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/172 |
08-11-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/136 |
02-24-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/167 |
06-14-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
07-16-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/128 |
08-14-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/174 |
08-26-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/138 |
03-22-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/167 |
07-07-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/134 |
10-31-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/175 |
09-18-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/142 |
05-24-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/176 |
10-20-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/108 |
10-18-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/129 |
09-04-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/115 |
02-24-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-09-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/178 |
12-18-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/111 |
11-11-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/131 |
09-12-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-28-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
1:47:82 |
1/104 |
09-08-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/124 |
05-18-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/106 |
10-01-06 |
bah, this was a 1:44 but for some unknown reason I missed the goal. 1:23.2 last check. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-13-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/115 |
01-14-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
1:44:30 |
1/107 |
10-14-06 |
|
|
1/171 |
07-14-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/135 |
12-10-07 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/175 |
10-06-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
06-08-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/169 |
08-02-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/136 |
01-06-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/164 |
05-29-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/144 |
06-24-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/125 |
06-19-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/172 |
08-11-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/137 |
02-24-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/166 |
06-15-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
07-25-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/132 |
10-05-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/174 |
08-26-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/137 |
03-29-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/168 |
07-08-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/134 |
11-02-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/175 |
09-20-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/142 |
05-24-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
1:44:30 |
1/107 |
10-14-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/177 |
10-25-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/108 |
10-23-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/117 |
03-01-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/129 |
09-05-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/115 |
02-24-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-09-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/179 |
12-21-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/111 |
12-23-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/131 |
09-27-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/121 |
04-30-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
1:47:82 |
1/105 |
09-11-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/125 |
05-21-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/106 |
10-05-06 |
bah, this was a 1:44 but for some unknown reason I missed the goal. 1:23.2 last check. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-13-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/115 |
01-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/170 |
07-15-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/136 |
12-15-07 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/164 |
04-19-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
06-10-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/169 |
08-02-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/136 |
01-13-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/164 |
05-31-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/144 |
07-01-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/125 |
06-22-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/173 |
08-11-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/138 |
02-25-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/167 |
06-16-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
08-02-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/133 |
10-13-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/174 |
08-27-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/138 |
04-13-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/169 |
07-08-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/134 |
11-09-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/175 |
09-20-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/142 |
05-25-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/117 |
02-20-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
1:44:30 |
1/107 |
10-15-06 |
|
|
1/125 |
06-14-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/176 |
10-29-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/109 |
10-24-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-01-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/129 |
09-07-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/115 |
02-24-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-09-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/103 |
08-30-06 |
1:26 checkpoint, suckish truck. the ramp trick really helped out here. |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/179 |
12-22-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/111 |
12-24-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/132 |
09-28-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/122 |
05-08-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
1:47:82 |
1/105 |
09-12-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-03-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/114 |
01-13-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/107 |
10-06-06 |
bah, this was a 1:44 but for some unknown reason I missed the goal. 1:23.2 last check. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-13-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/115 |
01-27-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/161 |
03-30-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/143 |
05-27-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/169 |
07-15-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/137 |
12-17-07 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/170 |
08-04-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/136 |
01-20-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/164 |
06-04-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
07-06-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/125 |
08-04-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/173 |
08-12-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/137 |
03-01-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/166 |
06-25-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/146 |
08-05-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/132 |
10-15-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/174 |
09-04-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/139 |
04-14-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/168 |
07-09-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/134 |
11-14-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/175 |
09-21-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
1:44:30 |
1/108 |
10-16-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/119 |
04-06-07 |
not sure why this wasn't 1:38 since I had a 1:18 last check, oh well |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/177 |
11-02-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/110 |
10-28-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/130 |
09-08-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/115 |
02-24-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-09-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/104 |
09-01-06 |
1:26 checkpoint, suckish truck. the ramp trick really helped out here. |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/179 |
01-08-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/111 |
12-24-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/123 |
05-11-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
1:47:82 |
1/105 |
09-12-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-04-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/114 |
01-13-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/107 |
10-10-06 |
bah, this was a 1:44 but for some unknown reason I missed the goal. 1:23.2 last check. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-23-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/115 |
01-27-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/175 |
09-21-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/143 |
05-27-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/170 |
07-15-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/138 |
12-17-07 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/164 |
04-30-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/136 |
02-08-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/165 |
06-06-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
07-06-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/126 |
08-04-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/174 |
08-18-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/137 |
03-02-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/133 |
10-19-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/173 |
09-11-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/138 |
04-14-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/168 |
07-09-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/134 |
11-23-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
1:44:30 |
1/108 |
10-16-06 |
|
|
1/115 |
02-24-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-06-07 |
not sure why this wasn't 1:38 since I had a 1:18 last check, oh well |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/177 |
11-15-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/110 |
10-28-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/130 |
09-08-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/116 |
02-24-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-09-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/104 |
09-02-06 |
1:26 checkpoint, suckish truck. the ramp trick really helped out here. |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/179 |
01-11-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/111 |
12-24-06 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/123 |
05-12-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
1:47:82 |
1/105 |
09-12-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/179 |
02-06-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/114 |
01-13-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/107 |
10-12-06 |
FINALLY 1:44!! Average run(123.3 last check) PERFECT truck, taped might upload |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-24-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/116 |
02-01-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/175 |
09-22-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/143 |
05-29-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/170 |
07-15-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/136 |
12-21-07 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/164 |
05-03-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/144 |
06-11-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/171 |
08-07-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/137 |
02-24-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/166 |
06-07-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/144 |
07-09-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/126 |
08-09-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/173 |
08-19-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/137 |
03-08-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/166 |
06-26-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/133 |
10-21-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/173 |
09-11-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/139 |
04-19-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/168 |
07-10-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/135 |
11-24-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/116 |
02-02-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
1:44:30 |
1/108 |
10-16-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-07-07 |
:( |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/177 |
11-15-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/111 |
10-30-06 |
all I can say is OMG. 1:21 on last check, 100% PERFECT truck because I found a new strategy to eliminate most of the luck. I don't think much better is possible here. |
|
1/118 |
03-03-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/130 |
09-09-07 |
bad building and I missed a rail... 1:36 might actually be possible |
|
1/116 |
02-25-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/120 |
04-09-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
|
1/104 |
09-05-06 |
1:25 check, 1:46 is definitely possible. |
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
01-19-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/111 |
12-26-06 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/124 |
05-12-07 |
Oh come on CE whats is wrong with you doing this kinda thing to me |
1:47:82 |
1/105 |
09-12-06 |
|
|
1/116 |
02-26-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/180 |
02-12-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/114 |
01-13-07 |
I can say without a doubt, that 1:38 is maxed, and anyone that claims 1:37 or lower is BSing. |
|
1/181 |
03-09-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/144 |
06-02-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/170 |
07-20-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/137 |
12-31-07 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/164 |
05-04-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/144 |
06-13-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/124 |
06-14-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/172 |
08-11-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/136 |
02-24-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/166 |
06-11-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/145 |
07-09-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/127 |
08-12-07 |
i hate checkpoint abuse so up this goes |
|
1/173 |
08-24-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/138 |
03-09-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/166 |
07-03-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/133 |
10-27-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
1/174 |
09-13-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/140 |
04-27-08 |
I like this time better than 1:36.89, it is even. |
|
1/168 |
07-11-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
1/135 |
11-26-07 |
I was like HOLY **** finally 1:36.., as it only took a 11-minute play session. but I messed the building up a little bit cause I accidently held a camera button down. 1:35 is possible..video to come someday, when I get a cleaner-looking 1:36 |
|
2/188 |
12-27-10 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
2/103 |
08-30-06 |
close! 1:27 checkpoint, if I had better luck at the truck this would of been 1:48 easily. still a pretty good time I think |
|
2/189 |
01-08-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
2/183 |
04-12-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
2/187 |
06-30-10 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
2/184 |
04-13-10 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
2/186 |
06-30-10 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
2/167 |
06-26-09 |
Getting this low took a grand total of 2000 hours and over 50,000 attempts. Anybody that can nail this run or better(1:35) w/o check abuse is CRAZY! |
|
2/189 |
10-20-10 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
3/193 |
06-08-11 |
|
|
3/103 |
08-27-06 |
1:28 checkpoint, decent ending. |
|
3/192 |
07-24-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
3/211 |
08-13-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
3/192 |
04-03-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
3/212 |
08-19-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
3/191 |
04-05-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
3/102 |
08-18-06 |
1:28 checkpoint, decent ending. |
|
3/192 |
06-25-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
3/103 |
08-18-06 |
1:28 checkpoint, decent ending. |
|
3/192 |
06-25-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
3/103 |
08-18-06 |
1:28 checkpoint, decent ending. |
|
3/192 |
07-13-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
3/103 |
08-26-06 |
1:28 checkpoint, decent ending. |
|
3/192 |
07-20-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
4/204 |
01-13-12 |
|
|
4/210 |
09-03-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
4/206 |
04-13-12 |
It sure feels nice to improve, even if not by much. I'll be damned if I don't get at least second place! |
|
4/204 |
01-24-12 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
4/102 |
08-12-06 |
Lost 0.5 sec before goal, otherwise pretty good. |
|
4/207 |
04-25-12 |
It sure feels nice to improve, even if not by much. I'll be damned if I don't get at least second place! |
|
4/204 |
01-31-12 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
4/102 |
08-14-06 |
Lost 0.5 sec before goal, otherwise pretty good. |
|
4/211 |
09-14-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
4/208 |
04-26-12 |
It sure feels nice to improve, even if not by much. I'll be damned if I don't get at least second place! |
|
4/198 |
11-01-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
4/210 |
07-03-12 |
It sure feels nice to improve, even if not by much. I'll be damned if I don't get at least second place! |
|
4/204 |
02-09-12 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
4/102 |
08-14-06 |
Lost 0.5 sec before goal, otherwise pretty good. |
|
4/210 |
09-14-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
4/208 |
05-02-12 |
It sure feels nice to improve, even if not by much. I'll be damned if I don't get at least second place! |
|
4/204 |
02-25-12 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
4/211 |
09-17-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
4/209 |
05-26-12 |
It sure feels nice to improve, even if not by much. I'll be damned if I don't get at least second place! |
|
4/212 |
08-27-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
4/205 |
03-11-12 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
4/212 |
09-20-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
4/210 |
05-26-12 |
It sure feels nice to improve, even if not by much. I'll be damned if I don't get at least second place! |
|
4/204 |
12-28-11 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
4/205 |
03-21-12 |
It sure feels nice to improve, even if not by much. I'll be damned if I don't get at least second place! |
|
4/205 |
01-01-12 |
I will get this one back someday. I have to.... |
|
4/205 |
03-30-12 |
It sure feels nice to improve, even if not by much. I'll be damned if I don't get at least second place! |
|
5/102 |
08-06-06 |
1:29 checkpoint, good truck. However I have a bad habit of wasting 2 seconds when trying to line up with the goal point, which..sucks. |
|
5/213 |
10-04-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
5/102 |
08-04-06 |
1:29 checkpoint, good truck. However I have a bad habit of wasting 2 seconds when trying to line up with the goal point, which..sucks. |
|
5/212 |
08-28-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
5/102 |
08-06-06 |
1:29 checkpoint, good truck. However I have a bad habit of wasting 2 seconds when trying to line up with the goal point, which..sucks. |
|
5/211 |
08-30-12 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
6/101 |
07-07-06 |
Without a doubt, this was an insane run. 1:32.4 checkpoint, good truck. Not sure if I want to even attempt to try for lower here... |
|
6/322 |
02-12-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
6/219 |
01-09-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
6/322 |
11-26-22 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
6/220 |
01-09-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
6/322 |
12-16-22 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/221 |
01-10-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
7/273 |
08-16-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/324 |
07-16-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/102 |
07-09-06 |
Without a doubt, this was an insane run. 1:32.4 checkpoint, good truck. Not sure if I want to even attempt to try for lower here... |
|
7/273 |
08-20-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/322 |
02-23-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/276 |
09-30-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/324 |
07-22-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/272 |
06-22-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/102 |
07-09-06 |
Without a doubt, this was an insane run. 1:32.4 checkpoint, good truck. Not sure if I want to even attempt to try for lower here... |
|
7/273 |
08-20-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/323 |
03-06-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/276 |
10-01-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/324 |
07-27-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/272 |
06-24-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/102 |
07-15-06 |
Found alot of things to save time, I think I can do 1:51 or 1:52 soon. 1:31 checkpoint. |
|
7/273 |
09-03-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/323 |
03-10-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/276 |
10-06-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/324 |
08-02-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/272 |
07-26-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/102 |
07-21-06 |
Found alot of things to save time, I think I can do 1:51 or 1:52 soon. 1:31 checkpoint. |
|
7/274 |
09-07-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/323 |
04-13-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/276 |
10-31-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/324 |
09-30-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/272 |
08-11-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/102 |
07-21-06 |
Found alot of things to save time, I think I can do 1:51 or 1:52 soon. 1:31 checkpoint. |
|
7/274 |
09-09-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/323 |
06-12-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/276 |
11-01-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/324 |
10-13-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/272 |
08-12-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/324 |
06-27-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/272 |
08-16-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/272 |
06-18-15 |
Still choked the rails but whatever I've had enough right now. A good time for me would be 1:14. |
|
7/221 |
01-09-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
7/101 |
07-07-06 |
1:34 checkpoint, nice truck even though I slowed down slightly because I got to close to the edge. |
|
7/275 |
09-24-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
7/324 |
07-11-23 |
30 minute session today. One second closer! 35 flat first check, 55 last check. Pretty good rails after landing the glitch, but still not quite perfect. |
|
7/273 |
08-16-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
8/283 |
04-29-16 |
|
|
8/222 |
01-11-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
8/283 |
09-11-16 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
8/322 |
11-21-22 |
Finally got off 1:17! Close to 1:15 too. Good rails for once and flawless ending without abusing last check which saved time. 35.7 first check (old strat), so it's time to learn the faster way once and for all... |
|
8/278 |
12-03-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
8/322 |
11-22-22 |
Finally got off 1:17! Close to 1:15 too. Good rails for once and flawless ending without abusing last check which saved time. 35.7 first check (old strat), so it's time to learn the faster way once and for all... |
|
8/278 |
12-03-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
8/99 |
07-01-06 |
Easily my best City run EVER. 1:34 checkpoint. The truck part sucked, which killed a possible 1:56-1:57 but it's finally sub-2 so good enough for me. |
|
8/283 |
08-06-16 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
8/322 |
11-24-22 |
still a 35 first check but I broke the sub 1:16. Can I improve this? Hell yes! |
|
8/278 |
12-12-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
8/100 |
07-04-06 |
Easily my best City run EVER. 1:34 checkpoint. The truck part sucked, which killed a possible 1:56-1:57 but it's finally sub-2 so good enough for me. |
|
8/278 |
12-20-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
8/101 |
07-05-06 |
Easily my best City run EVER. 1:34 checkpoint. The truck part sucked, which killed a possible 1:56-1:57 but it's finally sub-2 so good enough for me. |
|
8/284 |
08-30-16 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
8/101 |
07-06-06 |
Easily my best City run EVER. 1:34 checkpoint. The truck part sucked, which killed a possible 1:56-1:57 but it's finally sub-2 so good enough for me. |
|
8/276 |
11-05-15 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/290 |
08-04-17 |
|
|
9/223 |
01-13-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/284 |
12-27-16 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/223 |
01-13-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/284 |
12-28-16 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/223 |
01-13-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/284 |
12-29-16 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/222 |
01-11-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/291 |
09-23-17 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/223 |
01-14-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/284 |
01-10-17 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/222 |
01-12-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/291 |
10-16-17 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/222 |
01-12-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/283 |
11-26-16 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/222 |
01-12-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/283 |
12-16-16 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/222 |
01-12-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/294 |
12-10-17 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
9/223 |
01-12-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
9/283 |
12-21-16 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
10/299 |
10-11-18 |
|
|
10/224 |
01-19-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
10/300 |
01-05-19 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
10/225 |
01-19-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
10/301 |
02-06-19 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
10/272 |
06-18-15 |
In the rare event that the ramp thing actually works, I always choke on the rails and waste 5+ seconds. Sub 1:15 -SHOULD- be easy, but.... |
|
10/302 |
02-19-19 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
11/99 |
06-29-06 |
so close to that magic sub-2min time, 1:35 checkpoint. oh well, it's a matter of time now. |
|
11/225 |
01-21-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
11/306 |
08-29-19 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
12/225 |
02-08-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
12/307 |
08-30-19 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
12/225 |
02-15-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
12/307 |
09-03-19 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
12/225 |
02-22-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
13/314 |
03-02-20 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
13/99 |
06-27-06 |
OMG, best truck run ever! I stayed ball form the whole way, without bouncing once. then of course I went omgomg and missed the goal point. oh well, I feel this is still pretty good. (1:37.5 last checkpoint) |
|
13/314 |
03-20-20 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
13/226 |
02-17-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
13/314 |
12-02-20 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
13/228 |
04-30-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
14/322 |
11-16-22 |
Not what I wanted but an improvement. I need to learn the gravity control in the beginning, I can only manage a 35.47 check doing it the old way |
|
14/316 |
09-10-21 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
14/228 |
05-04-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
14/316 |
09-17-21 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
14/229 |
06-02-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
14/317 |
01-09-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
15/232 |
07-23-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
15/318 |
08-10-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
15/233 |
07-25-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
15/318 |
08-10-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
15/233 |
07-31-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
15/318 |
08-17-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
15/230 |
06-13-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
15/317 |
05-27-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
15/231 |
06-22-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
15/317 |
07-07-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
15/231 |
07-01-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
15/318 |
07-11-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
16/234 |
08-06-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
16/322 |
09-14-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
16/234 |
08-11-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
16/322 |
10-06-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
16/239 |
11-08-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
16/322 |
10-12-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
16/239 |
11-08-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
16/319 |
08-22-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
16/237 |
08-30-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
16/321 |
09-01-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
16/234 |
08-06-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
16/321 |
09-10-22 |
Sucks! 1.5 seconds slower to first check, 3 seconds wasted on rails. |
|
17/235 |
08-14-13 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
18/241 |
11-20-13 |
|
|
19/243 |
01-06-14 |
|
|
20/247 |
03-11-14 |
|
|
21/99 |
06-26-06 |
Better, but still sucks. TT= 1:59 |
|
21/248 |
05-13-14 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
21/98 |
06-26-06 |
Better, but still sucks. TT= 1:59 |
|
21/249 |
05-12-14 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
22/254 |
07-17-14 |
|
|
23/97 |
06-25-06 |
this...simply put absolutely sucks. There's a ridiclous number of ran dom factors to deal with through the whole level(mainly bouncing instead of staying in a ball) which gets even worse at the truck part, which blew plenty of possible 2:00-2:03&apos |
|
23/257 |
10-22-14 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
23/98 |
06-25-06 |
this...simply put absolutely sucks. There's a ridiclous number of ran dom factors to deal with through the whole level(mainly bouncing instead of staying in a ball) which gets even worse at the truck part, which blew plenty of possible 2:00-2:03&apos |
|
24/258 |
11-07-14 |
Sub 1:35 area at last! Getting there slowly. |
|
25/263 |
02-06-15 |
|
|
26/267 |
03-03-15 |
|
|
27/268 |
03-03-15 |
|
|
28/271 |
03-22-15 |
|
|
29/271 |
05-06-15 |
|
|
30/271 |
06-04-15 |
|
|
121/124 |
06-13-07 |
i cheated all my sonic times so i remove them |
|
122/125 |
06-08-07 |
|